Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Culturally Correct

In reading the chapter on cultural criticism, a few new concepts and ideas were brought to my attention for the first time about a novel I've spent close to three weeks reading and analyzing.  My first good realization occured after reading this passage, "Rather than approaching literature in the elitist way taht academic literary critics have traditionally approached it, cultural critics view it more as an anthropologist would" (412).  This line spoke to me because I took a class on anthropology last semester that I loved, and in that class I learned that anthropologists look to find the origin of both arts (high culture) and those of everyday activities.  In realizing that cultural criticism is all about any action any culture does at any time, with no distinction of class or race or any other possible variable.  I had been going at cultural analyses all wrong.  I always consdered culture in terms of "cultural events" or religious activities. 
Another passage that stuck out to me in the opening piece What is Cultural Criticism?, is on pages 422 and 423, "The future of literary criticism will owe a great deal indeed to those early cultural critics who demonstrated that the boundaries between high and low culture are at once repressive and permeable, that culture is common and therefore includes all forms of popular culture, that cultural definitions are inevitably political, and that world we see is seen through society's idealogy.  In a very real sense, the future of education is cultural studies" (422,423).  I like this idea of studying anything requires some sort of cultural history on the subject of inquiry, whether it be an artist, author, a society, or an artifact.  We, as humans, will always use cultural studies to know more about eachother, and why we do the things we do.
The essay, Imperialist Nostalgia and Wuthering Heights, by Nancy Armstrong looks deeply at cultural studies of the time period surrounding the novel Wuthering Heights, and the different occurences of the time and their reflection on Emily Bronte's characters and their actions.  In her section on Photography, Armstrong makes this comment, "For twenty years or so before Wuthering Heights appeared and caused a minor sensation, a number of individuals in England and France were developing the technology fo rmechanically reproducing images of the countryside and making them available to urban viewers.  This technology brought the more remote regions to the metropolis in much the same way that Wuthering Heights did" (438).  I especially like the comparison of novels, and the written word in general, acting as a kind of postcard for the time, place, and author of its contents, and I am glad to confirm that there are other people out there who look at literature in the same manner.

3 comments:

  1. I gathered something very similar in my own reading. The concept (or reality) that culture is permeable and even perhaps exists in a purely transitory state is a radically different idea than the one I think most students are reared with. We are exposed to culture(s) at every stage of our lives, and it only makes sense to view them as temporary lenses with which to understand the world. The slow accumulation of experience and knowledge lends itself to increasing our understanding of different aspects and levels of society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like what you are saying about a novel or any writing being a post card for the time.

    One of my favorite things about reading is being taken into someone elses world in another time and place. I love trying to imagine myself in that world and surrounded by that environment. Would I react the same, would I be able to adapt?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm glad you explained this because I did not immediately think of that, having no prior knowledge about anthropology. The imperialist nostalgia concept is almost laughable to me - the culture that we destroy, we then long for thereafter. It seems like a flaw in our culture (or rather, human nature maybe) that perhaps we live too much in the moment and do not spend enough time thinking about what effects that moment will produce in the future.

    ReplyDelete